>Didn't you just do the same thing you insulted Paul O'Brian over: >paraphrasing something someone said to create a "strawman argument?"
I don't think they're comparable, but then, I likely wouldn't, would I? But I do think there's a reasonable difference between taking a statement and rephrasing it so it means something it never, ever implied...and taking something that's stated pretty clearly and questioning its implications.
>P.S. Just read Strange #1 from the online link. Loved it. Really >well done. I'm curious as to how you and Sam Barnes are splitting the >writing duty.
She (and it's Samm) writes half, and I write half, then we revise each other's stuff to make it feel consistent.
jms
(jmsatb5@aol.com) (all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd., permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine and don't send me story ideas) |
|