Not necessarily...it may have been...

 Posted on 1/5/1994 by STRACZYNSKI [Joe] to GENIE


Not necessarily...it may have been 100-times in resolution, or it may
have been 1000-times in resolution...actually, as I think of it (via the fog
that's in my head) I think you're right...I knew there was a 1 and some 0s
involved in it...and it was a big deal...so maybe it *was* 1,000x.

jms