re: aicn coverage of richard biggs' passing

 Posted on 5/29/2004 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated

>Apart from that, just conveyed far too little pertinent information
>about a tragic event that's obviously affected many, many people. It was
>insensitive, incompetent reporting.
>
>When a few people complained (not abusively, either, just expressing deep
>disappointment) that this antiseptic one-liner was somewhat disrespectful,
>they deleted the blurb and all the talkbalk posts complaining about its
>insensitivity. This uber-geek guerilla news site evidently felt revisionism
>was the way to handle their mistake.

Be a real shame if somebody hacked their site....



jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2004 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)