>what I wondered was whether - whoever won in the end - you'd contemplate
>having your top-billed, most audience-friendly character (Sinclair)
>stand alongside EarthGov interests against them.
I'd have no problem with that propect. As long as a character has a logical,
justifiable reason for taking a particular stance, it's all grist for the mill.
Why shouldn't he take that stance if he genuinely believes it's right?
B5 Official Fan Club at:
(all message content (c) 2000 by
synthetic worlds, ltd., permission
to reprint specifically denied to