JMSNews
The J. Michael Straczynski Message Archive

 

JMSNews provides an archive of messages posted
by J. Michael Straczynski (JMS).

  Home      Community Forums      Contest      Links      FAQ      About JMS     

RSS Feed  

 Search all Messages

   Sort by: 

This field searches the text of all messages in the archive.

 Message
    From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
 Subject: Re: Attn JMS: Question on writing
      To: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated  
    Date: 8/25/2001 1:27:00 AM  

Message 1 in thread 

View this message only
 



>When you write, do you just go full tilt boogie stream of conciousness
>and that's it? Or, do you write stream of conciousness and then go
>back and edit and re-edit, adding subtle shadings until the words
>paint the picture you want?
>
>If the latter, how often do you find yourself going over a story until
>it's right? Perhaps that isn't a fair question, as it probably depends
>on how well the first draft came out of your head. But I ask because I
>want to know your answer, not merely guess at what might be your
>answer.

It depends. By and large, it breaks down as follows:

Scripts I tend to write once straight through and that's it, minus last minute
production changes (sets and the like). I hate outlining and avoid doing it
whenever possible because then the story's written, and I lose interest in
writing it. I like to find the story in the characters as I write them; I like
to be surprised by what happens, on the theory that if I'm surprised, then the
audience will be surprised.

The longer I take to write a script, invariably the weaker it is. Conversely,
the ones written in one pass, in one sitting, in white heat, tend to be my best
stuff. Sleeping in Light: written in under two days (though I'd thought about
it for years, so that may not be the best example). Gethsemane: one day.
Signs and Portents: two days. Chrysalis: one day. I could site others. Grey
17 took three weeks. It shows.

The thing about writing fast, for me, is that it forces me to get out of my own
way. I don't second-guess myself, I just listen to the characters and write
down what they say without questioning it or over-analyzing it. And I try to
avoid rewriting because I think it leeches life out of a script.

Fiction: here I tend to write and rewrite ceaselessly. I'm about 200 pages
into a novel I've been writing for the last year or so, and I've rewritten the
first 100 pages at least 20 times, because it's a different process...it's
about creating a mood on the page, handling description differently from a
script (which is fairly straightforward) so that you create word pictures. I
also trim and snip and cut and tidy until there isn't an inch of fat on the
thing, it's lean and mean and ready to go. Fortunately, fiction allows that
kind of detail work, which TV does not.

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)
    From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
 Subject: Re: Attn JMS: Question on writing
      To: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated  
    Date: 8/25/2001 1:27:00 AM  

Message 2 in thread 

View this message only
 



>When you write, do you just go full tilt boogie stream of conciousness
>and that's it? Or, do you write stream of conciousness and then go
>back and edit and re-edit, adding subtle shadings until the words
>paint the picture you want?
>
>If the latter, how often do you find yourself going over a story until
>it's right? Perhaps that isn't a fair question, as it probably depends
>on how well the first draft came out of your head. But I ask because I
>want to know your answer, not merely guess at what might be your
>answer.

It depends. By and large, it breaks down as follows:

Scripts I tend to write once straight through and that's it, minus last minute
production changes (sets and the like). I hate outlining and avoid doing it
whenever possible because then the story's written, and I lose interest in
writing it. I like to find the story in the characters as I write them; I like
to be surprised by what happens, on the theory that if I'm surprised, then the
audience will be surprised.

The longer I take to write a script, invariably the weaker it is. Conversely,
the ones written in one pass, in one sitting, in white heat, tend to be my best
stuff. Sleeping in Light: written in under two days (though I'd thought about
it for years, so that may not be the best example). Gethsemane: one day.
Signs and Portents: two days. Chrysalis: one day. I could site others. Grey
17 took three weeks. It shows.

The thing about writing fast, for me, is that it forces me to get out of my own
way. I don't second-guess myself, I just listen to the characters and write
down what they say without questioning it or over-analyzing it. And I try to
avoid rewriting because I think it leeches life out of a script.

Fiction: here I tend to write and rewrite ceaselessly. I'm about 200 pages
into a novel I've been writing for the last year or so, and I've rewritten the
first 100 pages at least 20 times, because it's a different process...it's
about creating a mood on the page, handling description differently from a
script (which is fairly straightforward) so that you create word pictures. I
also trim and snip and cut and tidy until there isn't an inch of fat on the
thing, it's lean and mean and ready to go. Fortunately, fiction allows that
kind of detail work, which TV does not.

jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd.,
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine
and don't send me story ideas)

Site © 2015 Midnight Design Productions  -  Message content © 2015 by Synthetic Worlds  -  Privacy Statement