From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Minbari Physiology
To: CIS
Date: 3/31/1996 7:04:00 AM
|
Message 1 in thread
View this message only
|
Fred Owens <74051.3602@compuserve.com> asks: > Joe, Silly question probably but, is Minbari sexual physiology > completely compatible with human physiology?
No, not under normal circumstances; it'd have to undergo some fairly extensive genetic modifications before that could happen.
jms |
|
From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Minbari Physiology
To: CIS
Date: 3/31/1996 8:59:00 AM
|
Message 2 in thread
View this message only
|
Bill Dugan <71016.576@compuserve.com> asks: > Do you mean that relations wouldn't be fertile, or that it would > be physically impossible to do it at all?
They wouldn't be fertile, no...as for impossible, the long history of odd human sexual behavior seems to indicate that for some folks, there ain't much that's impossible to mess about with.
jms |
|
From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Minbari Physiology
To: CIS
Date: 4/1/1996 9:37:00 AM
|
Message 3 in thread
View this message only
|
Bill Hirst <104106.431@compuserve.com> asks: > Didn't G'Kar ask Lyta about interspecies mating in the pilot with > the intention of producing a telepathic Narn?
Yes, he did ask her about mating, and in the course of that discussion mentioned the genetic manipulation that would be required.
jms |
|