From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
Subject: SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards
To: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
Date: 11/21/1999 10:10:00 PM
|
Message 1 in thread
View this message only
|
I think that we have a British/American misunderstanding here, because the
gesture reported is not designated as one that calls the person asking the
question a "wanker," at least not in this country, though it may be in the UK.
It's more meant here as indicating that the person talking doesn't have a clue
and is just jerking around with the answer.
Though it's a moot point, since SFX is a fairly useless publication on just
about every imaginable front. Never have so many jumped-up fanboys done so
little, with so much, for so long.
Wankers.
jms
(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com |
|
From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
Subject: SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards
To: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
Date: 11/23/1999 2:02:00 PM
|
Message 2 in thread
View this message only
|
>Maybe now they aren't <that> good. Most of their crimes are those of
>self-indulgence, and self-congratulation.
Having been a journalist myself, I also kind of have a problem with an editor
of a publication using that publication as a tool in a fanboy vendetta. But
that's just me, I'm whacky that way.
jms
(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com |
|
From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
Subject: SFX Magazine, JMS and Double Standards
To: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
Date: 11/27/1999 12:46:00 PM
|
Message 3 in thread
View this message only
|
Paul...
Re: your synopsis.
Marry me.
jms
(jmsatb5@aol.com)
B5 Official Fan Club at:
http://www.thestation.com |
|
