From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Secure Communications
To: CIS
Date: 5/2/1997 5:26:00 PM
|
Message 1 in thread
View this message only
|
So they could see him and know by seeing him that he arrived
safely; a text message could be sent by *anyone* who could've
intercepted them.
jms |
|
From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Secure Communications
To: CIS
Date: 5/3/1997 11:47:00 AM
|
Message 2 in thread
View this message only
|
{original post had no questions}
The issue of waste of bandwith is not as big a deal to an
advanced technology (from today's standards); also, any really good
telepath could rip out those codes and keys in about 10 seconds.
Further, they would've had a password to use (as in "the board," which
he used) to verify that he was all right and not being forced to make
the call.
jms |
|
From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com>
Subject: Secure Communications
To: CIS
Date: 5/6/1997 6:16:00 PM
|
Message 3 in thread
View this message only
|
{original post had no questions}
In that scenario, there is no such thing as ANY kind of secure
communication, which puts us pretty much back where we started.
jms |
|
